View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-22-2006, 02:09 PM
logan logan is offline
OSP Starters
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
logan is on a distinguished road
Default

Site with practically static content = use your CMS to "staticalize" the pages then upload them. You only have to do this if something updates or if you decide to change your layout. This is like, for old articles, or stuff. Less server overhead.Kind of how like blogger.com works when you use the FTP publish. Not the beta blogger, the "old" blogger. Site with usually changing content = mod_rewrite might be a good idea.
It depends though on what you want to achieve and how much computing power you have, and if .0001 seconds make a difference or not. I personally have little need for the dynamic stuff on my sites -- This message may have been cut off and the rest will only be shown to members. To become a member, click here --
Reply With Quote
  Webmaster Forums - View Single Post - what all you experts think would be best about dynamic pages .
View Single Post
  #5  
Old 09-22-2006, 02:09 PM
logan logan is offline
OSP Starters
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
logan is on a distinguished road
Default

Site with practically static content = use your CMS to "staticalize" the pages then upload them. You only have to do this if something updates or if you decide to change your layout. This is like, for old articles, or stuff. Less server overhead.Kind of how like blogger.com works when you use the FTP publish. Not the beta blogger, the "old" blogger. Site with usually changing content = mod_rewrite might be a good idea.
It depends though on what you want to achieve and how much computing power you have, and if .0001 seconds make a difference or not. I personally have little need for the dynamic stuff on my sites -- This message may have been cut off and the rest will only be shown to members. To become a member, click here --
Reply With Quote